Great Rules for writing from William Safire in the New York Times
Do not put statements in the negative form. And don't start sentences with a conjunction. It is incumbent on one to avoid archaisms. If you reread your work, you will find on rereading that a great deal of repetition can be avoided by re-reading and editing. Never use a long word when a diminutive one will do. Unqualified superlatives are the worst of all. De-accession euphemisms. If any word is improper at the end of a sentence, a linking verb is. Avoid trendy locutions that sound flaky. Never, ever use repetitive redundancies. Also, avoid awkward or affected alliteration. Last, but not least, avoid cliches like the plague.
05 February, 2009
22 December, 2008
Eyes wide shut!
I have grown wary of the simplistic ways in which the well educated urban youth looks at the recent terror attack and current political/economic issues and the naïve quick fix solutions they suggest. The biggest argument against anyone like me who questions these simplistic, at times even irrational/illogical theories is, ‘if not this then what’s your answer’? As if questioning the rational makes it binding to provide answers!
Well, I feel that answers are there but to understand and appreciate ‘my sort’ of answers one should be at least willing to analyze, debate and understand the root cause of any issue. Without addressing it, suggesting simple, superficial (mostly jingoistic) solutions does nothing but only makes one ‘feel good’(it’s a different story that most of the times that’s all people aim at)
What is even more disturbing is the sympathetic considerations and even explicit support that certain morally, intellectually and ethically flawed political actions are getting these days. Some examples of really dangerous interpretations are, people’s opinion that India must follow the US example to combat terror, or Raj Thakrey’s point is valid but the means (use of force) are inappropriate, or that Hindu terrorism is a justified aftermath of Islamic terrorism, or thinking that draconian anti-terror laws will help combat terror better, the really naïve ones are about giving better education and changing people’s thinking and getting rid of corrupt politicians!
What is seen to be absolutely lacking today, is logical and open minded scrutiny of any policy/political decision and analyzing how it impacts the society (by society I mean everybody who is a part of it and not just the urban middle class).
Let me address some common myths and underlying real reasons.
Myth No. 1 - India should follow US example and take strict military action against terrorist camps in Pakistan
Evaluating effectiveness of any past strategy/policy is extremely important before accepting or promoting it. America’s war on terror has been far from being effective against terrorism and though some may conclude that because of this so called war on terror, there have been no more attacks on US. Even though the later is true, but US war on terror has made the whole world a lot more unsafe than before, and that is a serious problem. Also another important aspect (which is again easily overlooked) is how much harm has US caused to Al-queda or bin laden or the actual terrorist camps? Post 9/11 it launched into a full blown war against Afghanistan in retaliation against the militant group, which the US itself had fostered when it was at odds with the Soviet Union in the late 80s and early 90s. Whatever may be the reason, Afghanistan today is a country with the largest number of widows and orphans and the terrorist outfits just moved their camps to Pakistan1
We also need to understand any country (other than Pakistan itself) does not have the moral/political right to bomb any territory (even if its occupied by terrorist) within its boundary. It will surely result in deaths of lot more civilians than the terrorists and only deepen the mutual hatred giving further support to terrorist campaigns. Instead, it is far wiser to let Pakistan handle its own mess. Also the world (read US for all practical purposes) should stop giving legitimacy to Pakistan army. Why did Rice have to meet Pak army chief? Is it a common procedure in other states? Is it not that by doing this act, US acknowledges the army’s hold giving it political legitimacy? To do this on one side and ask Pak government to act tough against terrorism on the other is of course in line with usual US hypocrisy.
Myth No 2: Corruption is root cause of all internal mess we have
The problem with this myth is when people say this they imagine corruption of traffic hawaldar and police and govt offices not understanding how a system that is based on corrupt practices is exploitative. Also people imagine politicians as some independent entities (much like hindi films) who operate in isolation with the system and society. They cannot understand in fact, they will be very angry if you point out legal and illegal corruption of corporations and other private people who actually maintain corrupt politicians in office. As corporations are the leading barons of India shining saying anything against them is criminal and of course anti-development! The poor governance that results out of vested interests that large corporates have is incomprehensible to these people, you are not even allowed to bring it up!
Myth no 3: Because of poverty people fall prey to terrorist traps and give them information in exchange for petty returns
This argument does not explain involvement of educated professionals in masterminding and carrying out so many of the recent terrorist operations. What about similar religious propaganda spread by RSS, Bajrang Dal and the likes? Their recruits are in fact high caste well educated and mostly urban middle class or higher-middle class youth. The worse part is these organizations even have the state at their disposal which results in Gujarat like pogroms. How do we address this issue with the above argument?
Myth no 4: We need tougher anti-terror laws
While there could be a strong case, specially in the light of recent Mumbai attacks to strengthen our intelligence network and disaster management systems but the move should be towards increased transparency and accountability and not reduced. One example of failed tough laws that merits consideration is India’s handling of northeast and Kashmir issues. There have been really tough laws, especially in case of northeast and constant military presence in both regions but situation has never improved. It only worsened. Also one should understand that state repression can be much worse (example emergency/ Gujarat pogrom) than an independent isolated group’s terrorism. Hence there should always be enough checks and balances on state power and we should demand more transparent laws, laws that empower people not the state.
These are just a few examples from the current issues and the list can go on and on…The point I want to highlight is that lack of public awareness and understanding of politics is fatal for any society and specially a democracy which thrives upon public participation and debate. If we take naive views like globalization is good, population is bad, terrorism is only Islamic etc, real issues never come up and the politics underneath is not understood. The worst part is, such ignorance gives legitimacy to morally, economically and legally flawed political decisions.
I have grown wary of the simplistic ways in which the well educated urban youth looks at the recent terror attack and current political/economic issues and the naïve quick fix solutions they suggest. The biggest argument against anyone like me who questions these simplistic, at times even irrational/illogical theories is, ‘if not this then what’s your answer’? As if questioning the rational makes it binding to provide answers!
Well, I feel that answers are there but to understand and appreciate ‘my sort’ of answers one should be at least willing to analyze, debate and understand the root cause of any issue. Without addressing it, suggesting simple, superficial (mostly jingoistic) solutions does nothing but only makes one ‘feel good’(it’s a different story that most of the times that’s all people aim at)
What is even more disturbing is the sympathetic considerations and even explicit support that certain morally, intellectually and ethically flawed political actions are getting these days. Some examples of really dangerous interpretations are, people’s opinion that India must follow the US example to combat terror, or Raj Thakrey’s point is valid but the means (use of force) are inappropriate, or that Hindu terrorism is a justified aftermath of Islamic terrorism, or thinking that draconian anti-terror laws will help combat terror better, the really naïve ones are about giving better education and changing people’s thinking and getting rid of corrupt politicians!
What is seen to be absolutely lacking today, is logical and open minded scrutiny of any policy/political decision and analyzing how it impacts the society (by society I mean everybody who is a part of it and not just the urban middle class).
Let me address some common myths and underlying real reasons.
Myth No. 1 - India should follow US example and take strict military action against terrorist camps in Pakistan
Evaluating effectiveness of any past strategy/policy is extremely important before accepting or promoting it. America’s war on terror has been far from being effective against terrorism and though some may conclude that because of this so called war on terror, there have been no more attacks on US. Even though the later is true, but US war on terror has made the whole world a lot more unsafe than before, and that is a serious problem. Also another important aspect (which is again easily overlooked) is how much harm has US caused to Al-queda or bin laden or the actual terrorist camps? Post 9/11 it launched into a full blown war against Afghanistan in retaliation against the militant group, which the US itself had fostered when it was at odds with the Soviet Union in the late 80s and early 90s. Whatever may be the reason, Afghanistan today is a country with the largest number of widows and orphans and the terrorist outfits just moved their camps to Pakistan1
We also need to understand any country (other than Pakistan itself) does not have the moral/political right to bomb any territory (even if its occupied by terrorist) within its boundary. It will surely result in deaths of lot more civilians than the terrorists and only deepen the mutual hatred giving further support to terrorist campaigns. Instead, it is far wiser to let Pakistan handle its own mess. Also the world (read US for all practical purposes) should stop giving legitimacy to Pakistan army. Why did Rice have to meet Pak army chief? Is it a common procedure in other states? Is it not that by doing this act, US acknowledges the army’s hold giving it political legitimacy? To do this on one side and ask Pak government to act tough against terrorism on the other is of course in line with usual US hypocrisy.
Myth No 2: Corruption is root cause of all internal mess we have
The problem with this myth is when people say this they imagine corruption of traffic hawaldar and police and govt offices not understanding how a system that is based on corrupt practices is exploitative. Also people imagine politicians as some independent entities (much like hindi films) who operate in isolation with the system and society. They cannot understand in fact, they will be very angry if you point out legal and illegal corruption of corporations and other private people who actually maintain corrupt politicians in office. As corporations are the leading barons of India shining saying anything against them is criminal and of course anti-development! The poor governance that results out of vested interests that large corporates have is incomprehensible to these people, you are not even allowed to bring it up!
Myth no 3: Because of poverty people fall prey to terrorist traps and give them information in exchange for petty returns
This argument does not explain involvement of educated professionals in masterminding and carrying out so many of the recent terrorist operations. What about similar religious propaganda spread by RSS, Bajrang Dal and the likes? Their recruits are in fact high caste well educated and mostly urban middle class or higher-middle class youth. The worse part is these organizations even have the state at their disposal which results in Gujarat like pogroms. How do we address this issue with the above argument?
Myth no 4: We need tougher anti-terror laws
While there could be a strong case, specially in the light of recent Mumbai attacks to strengthen our intelligence network and disaster management systems but the move should be towards increased transparency and accountability and not reduced. One example of failed tough laws that merits consideration is India’s handling of northeast and Kashmir issues. There have been really tough laws, especially in case of northeast and constant military presence in both regions but situation has never improved. It only worsened. Also one should understand that state repression can be much worse (example emergency/ Gujarat pogrom) than an independent isolated group’s terrorism. Hence there should always be enough checks and balances on state power and we should demand more transparent laws, laws that empower people not the state.
These are just a few examples from the current issues and the list can go on and on…The point I want to highlight is that lack of public awareness and understanding of politics is fatal for any society and specially a democracy which thrives upon public participation and debate. If we take naive views like globalization is good, population is bad, terrorism is only Islamic etc, real issues never come up and the politics underneath is not understood. The worst part is, such ignorance gives legitimacy to morally, economically and legally flawed political decisions.
16 December, 2008
Shoes off to Bush!
The Iraqi journalist who hurled his shoes towards Bush has suddenly become the icon of Iraqi feelings towards US occupation and rightly so...People from US and west may call it an uncivilized display of emotions but who decides what's civilized?? In Iraqi culture hitting someone with a shoe is a strong insult. It means the person is as low as the dirt underneath the sole of a shoe. If that's what the journalist feels about Bush, he communicated it in best possible way and in line with his culture!
No amount of harsh words, insults, contempt (and shoes) can be enough to represent Iraqi people's anger towards a false and greedy war that promised people freedom (oil excluded) at intolerable human cost...
I can sympathize with the journalist’s anger and anguish and I’m even impressed with his courage and presence of mind. I am sure there must be lot of people(specially journalists) around the who world would have felt ‘oh why didn’t I think of this’
The only saving grace for Bush would be to have the courage to say that the journalist, while exercising his freedom of expression acted as per what he felt was right. And though his behavior may not be ‘civilized’ as per western standards, there was nothing criminal about it and hence let him free. But knowing america's propensity to hypocrisy and changing definitions of freedom and democracy, that's a remote possibility...
Also it makes one wonder about how much has really changed in Iraq for anyone who does not agree with the administration???
The Iraqi journalist who hurled his shoes towards Bush has suddenly become the icon of Iraqi feelings towards US occupation and rightly so...People from US and west may call it an uncivilized display of emotions but who decides what's civilized?? In Iraqi culture hitting someone with a shoe is a strong insult. It means the person is as low as the dirt underneath the sole of a shoe. If that's what the journalist feels about Bush, he communicated it in best possible way and in line with his culture!
No amount of harsh words, insults, contempt (and shoes) can be enough to represent Iraqi people's anger towards a false and greedy war that promised people freedom (oil excluded) at intolerable human cost...
I can sympathize with the journalist’s anger and anguish and I’m even impressed with his courage and presence of mind. I am sure there must be lot of people(specially journalists) around the who world would have felt ‘oh why didn’t I think of this’
The only saving grace for Bush would be to have the courage to say that the journalist, while exercising his freedom of expression acted as per what he felt was right. And though his behavior may not be ‘civilized’ as per western standards, there was nothing criminal about it and hence let him free. But knowing america's propensity to hypocrisy and changing definitions of freedom and democracy, that's a remote possibility...
Also it makes one wonder about how much has really changed in Iraq for anyone who does not agree with the administration???
05 December, 2008
Terror truth...
Too much has been said and written about the Mumbai terror attack but I just failed to grasp what was so different about 'terror' this time? The only answer I could find was that this time the rich and the famous suffered...Death is a tragic reality for everybody but the current incident just proved that though all deaths are tragic, some are more tragic!
The media was so busy covering Taj, trident and the Nariman house events that they almost forgot that there were ‘terror attacks’ and people died at CST or some government run hospital, but that really doesn't sound like a big news, does it?? What was even more disgusting was the way the entire terror attack was used by the media as mega marketing even, talking about exclusive coverage!! Now how gratifying can one feel to know that some XYZ channel is ‘exclusively’ covering a national tragedy for him/her!
The TV was totally hopeless, too much of information very little analysis and absolute lack of substance... Not that the print media was any better but they were at least better in terms of drawing conclusions or asking the sensible questions….The TV just wanted to portray the politicians as the culprits!
Politicians being corrupt was fine till blasts happened at some mediocre old stations and bazaars frequented, by the poor whose death did n't really come across as ‘9/11’ in India! India was continuing to shine, investigations were taking there usual time, even the constitution seemed all right and everything was going quite smoothly. But guess what, the terrorists too realized that they were not being heard at all...
So they did what any intelligent strategist would do, change the target! That's how I guess they must have decided to attack 5-star hotels and foreign nationals! To their credit, they at least figured out what will ensure adequate attention... In fact they too must have got more than what they expected, after all when before did the page3 crowd (read Simi Garewal, Rahul Bose, Sharmila Tagore anyone and everyone from show business) talk about national security and terrorism! These people are trying to link tax paying with security! Does it mean if I pay my taxes, the government should have a preference in protecting me against someone who pays less tax?? Never mind the fact that taxes are evaded mostly by the rich and not the poor, but the argument itself is so disgusting….
The solutions offered are preposterous to say the least...It is simply made out to be the fault of some or all corrupt politicians! But what makes a corrupt politician so important? Who creates a corrupt politician, who benefits out of a corrupt system; it’s in whose interest to have inefficient and corrupt government bodies??
No body is asking these questions…No body is talking about general governance (or lack of it) issues, no body is talking about holding all political parties responsible for not being able to function in national interest even at crisis times, the list can go on and on….
To me, much of this outcry, about corrupt and inefficient politicians is just an over hyped reaction well used by the media to carry on the terror attack mania...These people are not saying anything new or different or even specific for that matter...Things will easily cool down once this anger dies down. The media will figure out some other 'happening' event to keep people (who care to watch) busy with their ‘exclusive’ coverage...
The major impact of this terror attack was, that for the first time, the urban rich and influential are scared of ‘their’ security and the middle class which aspires to be a part of this higher class shares their anxiety while trying to portray corrupt politician as the root cause of this whole issue...But the truth is that it is in the best interest of these same rich and influential people and established corporations to have corrupt and inefficient politicians in government offices! So at least they (corrupt politicians) are not going to go anywhere anytime soon...For the poor, well life was never safe or secure even in absence of terror attacks so the struggle for existence continues...
The truth is that the terrorist have figured out whose death will matter and the urban rich have just proved their strategy to be right!
Too much has been said and written about the Mumbai terror attack but I just failed to grasp what was so different about 'terror' this time? The only answer I could find was that this time the rich and the famous suffered...Death is a tragic reality for everybody but the current incident just proved that though all deaths are tragic, some are more tragic!
The media was so busy covering Taj, trident and the Nariman house events that they almost forgot that there were ‘terror attacks’ and people died at CST or some government run hospital, but that really doesn't sound like a big news, does it?? What was even more disgusting was the way the entire terror attack was used by the media as mega marketing even, talking about exclusive coverage!! Now how gratifying can one feel to know that some XYZ channel is ‘exclusively’ covering a national tragedy for him/her!
The TV was totally hopeless, too much of information very little analysis and absolute lack of substance... Not that the print media was any better but they were at least better in terms of drawing conclusions or asking the sensible questions….The TV just wanted to portray the politicians as the culprits!
Politicians being corrupt was fine till blasts happened at some mediocre old stations and bazaars frequented, by the poor whose death did n't really come across as ‘9/11’ in India! India was continuing to shine, investigations were taking there usual time, even the constitution seemed all right and everything was going quite smoothly. But guess what, the terrorists too realized that they were not being heard at all...
So they did what any intelligent strategist would do, change the target! That's how I guess they must have decided to attack 5-star hotels and foreign nationals! To their credit, they at least figured out what will ensure adequate attention... In fact they too must have got more than what they expected, after all when before did the page3 crowd (read Simi Garewal, Rahul Bose, Sharmila Tagore anyone and everyone from show business) talk about national security and terrorism! These people are trying to link tax paying with security! Does it mean if I pay my taxes, the government should have a preference in protecting me against someone who pays less tax?? Never mind the fact that taxes are evaded mostly by the rich and not the poor, but the argument itself is so disgusting….
The solutions offered are preposterous to say the least...It is simply made out to be the fault of some or all corrupt politicians! But what makes a corrupt politician so important? Who creates a corrupt politician, who benefits out of a corrupt system; it’s in whose interest to have inefficient and corrupt government bodies??
No body is asking these questions…No body is talking about general governance (or lack of it) issues, no body is talking about holding all political parties responsible for not being able to function in national interest even at crisis times, the list can go on and on….
To me, much of this outcry, about corrupt and inefficient politicians is just an over hyped reaction well used by the media to carry on the terror attack mania...These people are not saying anything new or different or even specific for that matter...Things will easily cool down once this anger dies down. The media will figure out some other 'happening' event to keep people (who care to watch) busy with their ‘exclusive’ coverage...
The major impact of this terror attack was, that for the first time, the urban rich and influential are scared of ‘their’ security and the middle class which aspires to be a part of this higher class shares their anxiety while trying to portray corrupt politician as the root cause of this whole issue...But the truth is that it is in the best interest of these same rich and influential people and established corporations to have corrupt and inefficient politicians in government offices! So at least they (corrupt politicians) are not going to go anywhere anytime soon...For the poor, well life was never safe or secure even in absence of terror attacks so the struggle for existence continues...
The truth is that the terrorist have figured out whose death will matter and the urban rich have just proved their strategy to be right!
02 February, 2008
Posting this blog very late, its about our trip to Montreal in Aug 2007.
----------------------
The last long weekend is over and before we know it its almost time to return !!
This long weekend we had been to Montreal and it was a really memorable trip…On 4th aug, Saturday morning we took a train(VIA rail) to montreal.. The train was at 7:30am. We got up at 5am as we had to catch 6:15am bus!! So with lots of last min hassles we managed to be at station 15min before time..Being family with kids we got priority boarding, this is the only previlage of traveling with kids :)) and trust me it ends there..The train was very comfortable and the views very pretty, we saw huge number fields, some small lakes and canals, basically a beautiful country side. Swar was pretty ok and to our comfort slept for the last 1 hr :) We reached montreal 15min before time, ie at 9:15am!!
We hurried to reach metro station and were horrified to learn that there were no lifts!! Only escalators and of course stairs!! With a hefty 8 months old baby, a stroller, a bag and a sack, we were not excited abt this at all!! Thanks to an elderly Japanese lady, we cud figure out where to go and which metro to catch to reach the biodome and also that the directions we had noted from internet for our journey from biodome to hotel were incorrect :((
Fun had just started…
After sweating it out carrying swar and all the luggage up and down numerous stairs, we finally reached the Biodome!!Here is brief info on biodome from wikipedia, I just don't have time to type all the information abt it so thot this will give you a nice idea :))
The Montreal Biodome (Biodôme de Montreal) is a facility located in Montreal that allows visitors to walk through replicas of four ecosystems found in the Americas. The building was originally constructed for the 1976 Olympic Games as a velodrome. It hosted both cycling and judo events.
The facility allows visitors to walk through replicas of four ecosystems found in the Americas:
• The Tropical Forest is a replica of the South American rainforest.
• The Laurentian Forest is a replica of the North American wilderness.
• The Saint Lawrence Marine Eco-system is an estuary habitat modeled on the Gulf of Saint Lawrence.
• A polar area that is divided into Arctic and Antarctic.
All the exhibits are housed inside the velodrome (cycling stadium) that was used for the cycling and judo events of the 1976 Summer Olympics, with each of the four environments taking up a portion of the stadium. A variety of animals live in each simulated habitat, ranging from the macaws in the Tropical Forest, to the lynx in the Laurentian Forest, to the penguins in the Antarctic and the different kinds of fish that inhabit the waters of the Saint Lawrence River.
This is one of the city's most popular tourist attractions, along with the Montreal Botanical Garden, Montreal Planetarium and the Montreal Insectarium.
The next thing was botanical garden
Montreal Botanical Garden is a large botanical garden in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. It is second in size only to Kew Gardens, London. The garden was founded in 1931, in the height of the Great Depression, by mayor Camillien Houde, after years of campaigning by Brother Marie-Victorin. It serves to educate the public in general and students of horticulture in particular, it serves to conserve endangered plant species, and it is used for botanical research.
The Chinese Garden is a part of the botanical garden, constructed along the traditional lines for a Chinese garden. It has many winding paths, an artificial mountain, and a building in the Chinese style housing a collection of penjing that have generously been donated. The garden is populated with Chinese plants. It is the largest Chinese garden in the world outside China.
We did not have time to explore the other parts of the garden :(
Anyways with lots of 'diverse' guidelines we reached our hotel and once we were there, we cud see the biodome rit ahead at the end of the street mont royal!! We laughed our hearts out at the absurd direction guidelines we had got, anyways reaching there was still a gr88 relief..
The room was gr88, clean and comfy. We took bath, fed swar and set out for dinner at around 9pm, which is pretty late here… We found ourselves at a greek restaurant and decided to give it try. The food was gr88 but hospitality was missing, it just felt like being somewhere in old pune where the hotel owner is really pissed off at seeing any customer :)) But fortunately the food was too good which made us forget the rude waitress and we had a hearty meal. After coming back to hotel at around 11pm, we decided to go out for coffee and took a small walk around. The nightlife was amazing.We were so tired that we slept the moment we hit the bed.
The next day Nikhil and I both woke up at 6:30am and we just cud not believe it!! We had slept very late and extremly tired so we thot something is wrong... The sun was shining so brightly that we thot maybe it afternoon or even 6:30pm. :)After chking and confirming time on laptop, mobile and my wristwatch we cud not believe our luck and started getting ready for another adventurous day.
We stepped into a small local café rit across the street for breakfast and what gr88 treat it turned out to be!! We enjoyed some fresh toasts, gr88 coffee and delicious fruits. After a very heavy breakfast we set out to month royal..
Mount Royal is a mountain on the Island of Montreal, immediately north of downtown Montreal, Quebec, Canada, the city to which it gave its name. The mountain is part of the Monteregian mountain chain situated between the Laurentians and the Appalachians. It consists of three peaks: Colline de la Croix (or Mont Royal proper) at 233 metres (764 feet), Colline d'Outremont (or Mont Murray, in the borough of Outremont ) at 211 metres (692 feet), and Colline de Westmount at 201 metres (659 feet) elevation above mean sea level. At this height, it might be otherwise considered a very tall hill, but it has always been called a mountain.
The mountain is the site of Mount Royal Park (officially Parc du Mont-Royal), one of Montreal's largest greenspaces. The park, most of which is wooded, was designed by Frederick Law Olmsted, who also designed New York's Central Park. The park contains two belvederes, the more prominent of which is the Kondiaronk Belvedere, a semicircular plaza with a chalet, overlooking downtown Montreal. Other features of the park are Beaver Lake, a small man-made lake; a short ski slope; a sculpture garden; Smith House, an interpretive centre; and a well-known monument to Sir George-Étienne Cartier. The park hosts athletic, tourist, and cultural activities.
That was it after peaceful 2 hrs at the hill we headed back to our hotel got to the station and reached home around 9:30pm…
Overall it was fantastic trip, gr88 experience and a trip full of memories that we will cherish for years to come :))
----------------------
The last long weekend is over and before we know it its almost time to return !!
This long weekend we had been to Montreal and it was a really memorable trip…On 4th aug, Saturday morning we took a train(VIA rail) to montreal.. The train was at 7:30am. We got up at 5am as we had to catch 6:15am bus!! So with lots of last min hassles we managed to be at station 15min before time..Being family with kids we got priority boarding, this is the only previlage of traveling with kids :)) and trust me it ends there..The train was very comfortable and the views very pretty, we saw huge number fields, some small lakes and canals, basically a beautiful country side. Swar was pretty ok and to our comfort slept for the last 1 hr :) We reached montreal 15min before time, ie at 9:15am!!
We hurried to reach metro station and were horrified to learn that there were no lifts!! Only escalators and of course stairs!! With a hefty 8 months old baby, a stroller, a bag and a sack, we were not excited abt this at all!! Thanks to an elderly Japanese lady, we cud figure out where to go and which metro to catch to reach the biodome and also that the directions we had noted from internet for our journey from biodome to hotel were incorrect :((
Fun had just started…
After sweating it out carrying swar and all the luggage up and down numerous stairs, we finally reached the Biodome!!Here is brief info on biodome from wikipedia, I just don't have time to type all the information abt it so thot this will give you a nice idea :))
The Montreal Biodome (Biodôme de Montreal) is a facility located in Montreal that allows visitors to walk through replicas of four ecosystems found in the Americas. The building was originally constructed for the 1976 Olympic Games as a velodrome. It hosted both cycling and judo events.
The facility allows visitors to walk through replicas of four ecosystems found in the Americas:
• The Tropical Forest is a replica of the South American rainforest.
• The Laurentian Forest is a replica of the North American wilderness.
• The Saint Lawrence Marine Eco-system is an estuary habitat modeled on the Gulf of Saint Lawrence.
• A polar area that is divided into Arctic and Antarctic.
All the exhibits are housed inside the velodrome (cycling stadium) that was used for the cycling and judo events of the 1976 Summer Olympics, with each of the four environments taking up a portion of the stadium. A variety of animals live in each simulated habitat, ranging from the macaws in the Tropical Forest, to the lynx in the Laurentian Forest, to the penguins in the Antarctic and the different kinds of fish that inhabit the waters of the Saint Lawrence River.
This is one of the city's most popular tourist attractions, along with the Montreal Botanical Garden, Montreal Planetarium and the Montreal Insectarium.
The next thing was botanical garden
Montreal Botanical Garden is a large botanical garden in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. It is second in size only to Kew Gardens, London. The garden was founded in 1931, in the height of the Great Depression, by mayor Camillien Houde, after years of campaigning by Brother Marie-Victorin. It serves to educate the public in general and students of horticulture in particular, it serves to conserve endangered plant species, and it is used for botanical research.
The Chinese Garden is a part of the botanical garden, constructed along the traditional lines for a Chinese garden. It has many winding paths, an artificial mountain, and a building in the Chinese style housing a collection of penjing that have generously been donated. The garden is populated with Chinese plants. It is the largest Chinese garden in the world outside China.
We did not have time to explore the other parts of the garden :(
Anyways with lots of 'diverse' guidelines we reached our hotel and once we were there, we cud see the biodome rit ahead at the end of the street mont royal!! We laughed our hearts out at the absurd direction guidelines we had got, anyways reaching there was still a gr88 relief..
The room was gr88, clean and comfy. We took bath, fed swar and set out for dinner at around 9pm, which is pretty late here… We found ourselves at a greek restaurant and decided to give it try. The food was gr88 but hospitality was missing, it just felt like being somewhere in old pune where the hotel owner is really pissed off at seeing any customer :)) But fortunately the food was too good which made us forget the rude waitress and we had a hearty meal. After coming back to hotel at around 11pm, we decided to go out for coffee and took a small walk around. The nightlife was amazing.We were so tired that we slept the moment we hit the bed.
The next day Nikhil and I both woke up at 6:30am and we just cud not believe it!! We had slept very late and extremly tired so we thot something is wrong... The sun was shining so brightly that we thot maybe it afternoon or even 6:30pm. :)After chking and confirming time on laptop, mobile and my wristwatch we cud not believe our luck and started getting ready for another adventurous day.
We stepped into a small local café rit across the street for breakfast and what gr88 treat it turned out to be!! We enjoyed some fresh toasts, gr88 coffee and delicious fruits. After a very heavy breakfast we set out to month royal..
Mount Royal is a mountain on the Island of Montreal, immediately north of downtown Montreal, Quebec, Canada, the city to which it gave its name. The mountain is part of the Monteregian mountain chain situated between the Laurentians and the Appalachians. It consists of three peaks: Colline de la Croix (or Mont Royal proper) at 233 metres (764 feet), Colline d'Outremont (or Mont Murray, in the borough of Outremont ) at 211 metres (692 feet), and Colline de Westmount at 201 metres (659 feet) elevation above mean sea level. At this height, it might be otherwise considered a very tall hill, but it has always been called a mountain.
The mountain is the site of Mount Royal Park (officially Parc du Mont-Royal), one of Montreal's largest greenspaces. The park, most of which is wooded, was designed by Frederick Law Olmsted, who also designed New York's Central Park. The park contains two belvederes, the more prominent of which is the Kondiaronk Belvedere, a semicircular plaza with a chalet, overlooking downtown Montreal. Other features of the park are Beaver Lake, a small man-made lake; a short ski slope; a sculpture garden; Smith House, an interpretive centre; and a well-known monument to Sir George-Étienne Cartier. The park hosts athletic, tourist, and cultural activities.
That was it after peaceful 2 hrs at the hill we headed back to our hotel got to the station and reached home around 9:30pm…
Overall it was fantastic trip, gr88 experience and a trip full of memories that we will cherish for years to come :))
05 July, 2006
The Degradation of the Lord...
Today I was reading the news about the actress Jayamala's claim of having visited the Lord Ayyappa temple and I was really amused by it. I am a Hindu by religion and I believe in God though I am not the least ritualistic. What amused me was how human beings judge God by their own standard and in the process question his Godliness itself.
God to me is supreme, almighty, immortal, omnipresent and someone with an unconditional love and compassion for all the living beings (not just human beings). God can not be a private property of any cast, religion, sect or gender. To him, all living beings are equal and this is the principle I have been taught since childhood and I sincerely believe in it. Also to me, God is pure and white. No shades of gray permitted.
With this image of God in my mind, I have a firm belief that he can never be wrong, selfish, unfair or unjust.
Now what amused me about the Jayamala incident is how man has stripped God off his Godliness. When a normal male human being, tries to practice celibacy (Bhramacharitva) he faces the challenge of being lured by the desires of his flesh.
So how does he avoid them? Simple, by abstention from women.
In my opinion if you are attracted by what you want to refrain from you are actually fooling yourself by claiming otherwise. So be it, but this is the simplest and sure-shot way to maintain the state of celibacy for men. Now this is the plight of a poor mortal man.
But look at the irony. Men believe if it is tough on them it should be equally or even more tough for God to refrain from such distractions!
So what can man do to help God maintain his celibacy?
Simple, deny God any access to women. So no women in the age of 10-50 can visit him, see him or touch him. Though they may believe in him, worship him but not see him. As if God can never exit, see or feel things beyond the confines of his temple, and if it were not for the help of men how in the world would have god preserved his celibacy. So men believe they are doing the best they can to help him!!
The most unfortunate thing is that God has been deemed incapable of staying by his principles and the assumption that he needs help from the chauvinistic male fraternity to control himself!
Look what have we done to God!!
This distrust in him must be the most painful thing for him to bear than to have female devotees visit the temple.
After imagining the plight of God in this situation I feel less sorry for myself and my fellow women-folk. God is undergoing much worse than us, definitely.
Oh Lord, I regret this immature and illogical behavior of we human beings (men) and request you to forgive them.
Today I was reading the news about the actress Jayamala's claim of having visited the Lord Ayyappa temple and I was really amused by it. I am a Hindu by religion and I believe in God though I am not the least ritualistic. What amused me was how human beings judge God by their own standard and in the process question his Godliness itself.
God to me is supreme, almighty, immortal, omnipresent and someone with an unconditional love and compassion for all the living beings (not just human beings). God can not be a private property of any cast, religion, sect or gender. To him, all living beings are equal and this is the principle I have been taught since childhood and I sincerely believe in it. Also to me, God is pure and white. No shades of gray permitted.
With this image of God in my mind, I have a firm belief that he can never be wrong, selfish, unfair or unjust.
Now what amused me about the Jayamala incident is how man has stripped God off his Godliness. When a normal male human being, tries to practice celibacy (Bhramacharitva) he faces the challenge of being lured by the desires of his flesh.
So how does he avoid them? Simple, by abstention from women.
In my opinion if you are attracted by what you want to refrain from you are actually fooling yourself by claiming otherwise. So be it, but this is the simplest and sure-shot way to maintain the state of celibacy for men. Now this is the plight of a poor mortal man.
But look at the irony. Men believe if it is tough on them it should be equally or even more tough for God to refrain from such distractions!
So what can man do to help God maintain his celibacy?
Simple, deny God any access to women. So no women in the age of 10-50 can visit him, see him or touch him. Though they may believe in him, worship him but not see him. As if God can never exit, see or feel things beyond the confines of his temple, and if it were not for the help of men how in the world would have god preserved his celibacy. So men believe they are doing the best they can to help him!!
The most unfortunate thing is that God has been deemed incapable of staying by his principles and the assumption that he needs help from the chauvinistic male fraternity to control himself!
Look what have we done to God!!
This distrust in him must be the most painful thing for him to bear than to have female devotees visit the temple.
After imagining the plight of God in this situation I feel less sorry for myself and my fellow women-folk. God is undergoing much worse than us, definitely.
Oh Lord, I regret this immature and illogical behavior of we human beings (men) and request you to forgive them.
24 May, 2006
India needs revolution
Generally countries achieve progress and development because of their foresighted leaders and efficient governments. In India, we are able to achieve it in spite of our government and politicians. It may sound paradoxical but it’s the fact for India.
As Herbert Spencer has said ‘The Republican form of government is the highest form of government: but because of this it requires the highest type of human nature, a type nowhere at present existing.’
As the quota issue grips the entire nation’s youth and medicos enter 13th day of their hunger strike the UPA coordination committee and Left parties come out with the outrageous decision of 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) to be implemented from June 2007!
The parliament which could never till date unanimously vote for 33% reservation for women is surprisingly united on this front. And why shouldn’t they be? After all who would like to lose their vote bags?
The opposition generally leaves no stone unturned when it comes to any religious issues. They even had time to violently react to Pope’s remarks on India’s religious intolerance. But back home, they seem to have no time to visit the medicos on hunger strike or to listen to their issues or concerns.
Well this is how democracy works! And as someone has correctly said, the right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
So let’s consider the facts before going further and commenting for or against it. Though all of us would primarily agree upon the fact that Govt. needs to do something for the truly ‘backward’ and downtrodden sections of society, is reserving seats in institutes of higher education the right way to handle the issue, remains a highly debatable subject. And yet it was passed without a single debate in parliament.
First and foremost question that would come to anyone’s mind (of course except Govt. and HRD minister) is how is this quota system going to help the truly ‘Backward’ classes?
Going one step further, let’s try to understand whom do you call ‘backward’?
My understanding of this word defines it as some section of a society which is left behind in the development process and does not get equal opportunity or access to basic necessities like primary education, health care, electricity, hygienic living conditions, etc
Now what does a seat in IIM or IIT mean to such people? They don’t even get a chance to attend primary school so higher education hardly ever figures out on their priority list. But that’s what the Govt. wants them to get, a seat in IIM or IIT! How generous, isn’t it?
Now the second most important question, how did the Govt. arrive at the magical figure of 27%? When you talk about what percentage of Indian population actually comprises of OBCs, we have many numbers. Mandal puts it at 52 per cent, the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) at 32 per cent, the National Family and Health Survey at 29.8 per cent, which is the correct figure? Nobody bother to find out and specifically not the Govt.
Karan Thapar in his show ‘Devil’s Advocate’ interviewed the HRD minister Arjun Singh and clearly exposed him for not having any case to introduce 27% reservations in higher education. But who cares, anyways?
Another important question is why are we talking about reservation for OBCs in particular? As these institutes already have reservations for SC/ST candidates. Also OBCs are a sizeable portion of the society and out of them people who are already graduates and aspiring for further education from such premiere institutes don’t really come across as ‘backward’ people.
So now that we are sure that this quota system does not mean anything to truly ‘backward’ section, lets understand what it means to urban grads who are termed backward on caste basis by the Govt. Actually calling an engineer or doctor as ‘backward’ on caste basis is the biggest way to insult him/her. OBC graduates should be the first ones to protest against such discrimination.
Now for a minute let’s consider that such an urban grad, termed backward by Govt. gets a seat for higher education in IIT or IIM or some other premier institute. How does it help people of his/her caste? What will be his/her social circle?
Does a person who has become say a surgeon on quota basis is going to do anything for his caste?
Obviously he/she cannot. It's not even appropriate to expect that because everybody has a right to chose their own career path.
After passing out from premiere institutes like these and getting a high salaried job this person will settle in some ultra modern urban locality or probably even out of India, have just 1 or 2 kids who will enjoy best of living standard and of course will continue to get quota benefit in India.
So what is the Govt. trying to achieve?
Why this sudden flow of compassion for graduate OBCs from the Govt.?
Well the answer is simple and obvious; secure votes of ignorant and truly backward sections of society by playing caste based politics. Our politicians have inculcated the divide and rule policy very well from the British Raj, if nothing else.
If the Govt. acts in a manner which is just and in true interest of Indian youth, it will gain the youth’s support. But that is not what they want.
Why?
For very obvious reasons, well educated urban youth almost always stay away from their hometowns or even the country itself and rarely vote. Also votes of an educated and well-aware person can never be taken for granted by any party, so why invest in it anyways?
It’s pure vote business, nothing more nothing less.
So what can the youth do to change the country’s fate? Well many things.
To start with, we should all vote. Strike when the iron is hot. This is the right time. The whole nation and especially the Indian youth need to unite and stand by the medicos.
It’s time to follow Gandhiji’s principles. Total non-cooperation with Govt. If all schools, colleges, institutes, hospitals join in a total non-cooperation movement; the Govt. will be forced to kneel down.
We also need more young and educated youth in politics. So long as we have 60 to 80 year old illiterate, ignorant and criminal minded people in Govt. offices, hardly any reforms can be expected.
We should support newly formed parties like the Lok Paritran and come forth to form more such parties.
Revolution is what we need today.
Ending on Spencer’s quote again, as he aptly puts across the government's arrogance as its biggest mistake in the following lines.
‘Anyone who studies the state of things which preceded the French Revolution will see that the tremendous catastrophe came about from so excessive a regulation of men's actions in all their details, and such an enormous drafting away of the products of their actions to maintain the regulating organization, that life was fast becoming impracticable. And if we ask what then made, and now makes, this error possible, we find it to be the political superstition that governmental power is subject to no restraints.’
As Herbert Spencer has said ‘The Republican form of government is the highest form of government: but because of this it requires the highest type of human nature, a type nowhere at present existing.’
As the quota issue grips the entire nation’s youth and medicos enter 13th day of their hunger strike the UPA coordination committee and Left parties come out with the outrageous decision of 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) to be implemented from June 2007!
The parliament which could never till date unanimously vote for 33% reservation for women is surprisingly united on this front. And why shouldn’t they be? After all who would like to lose their vote bags?
The opposition generally leaves no stone unturned when it comes to any religious issues. They even had time to violently react to Pope’s remarks on India’s religious intolerance. But back home, they seem to have no time to visit the medicos on hunger strike or to listen to their issues or concerns.
Well this is how democracy works! And as someone has correctly said, the right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
So let’s consider the facts before going further and commenting for or against it. Though all of us would primarily agree upon the fact that Govt. needs to do something for the truly ‘backward’ and downtrodden sections of society, is reserving seats in institutes of higher education the right way to handle the issue, remains a highly debatable subject. And yet it was passed without a single debate in parliament.
First and foremost question that would come to anyone’s mind (of course except Govt. and HRD minister) is how is this quota system going to help the truly ‘Backward’ classes?
Going one step further, let’s try to understand whom do you call ‘backward’?
My understanding of this word defines it as some section of a society which is left behind in the development process and does not get equal opportunity or access to basic necessities like primary education, health care, electricity, hygienic living conditions, etc
Now what does a seat in IIM or IIT mean to such people? They don’t even get a chance to attend primary school so higher education hardly ever figures out on their priority list. But that’s what the Govt. wants them to get, a seat in IIM or IIT! How generous, isn’t it?
Now the second most important question, how did the Govt. arrive at the magical figure of 27%? When you talk about what percentage of Indian population actually comprises of OBCs, we have many numbers. Mandal puts it at 52 per cent, the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) at 32 per cent, the National Family and Health Survey at 29.8 per cent, which is the correct figure? Nobody bother to find out and specifically not the Govt.
Karan Thapar in his show ‘Devil’s Advocate’ interviewed the HRD minister Arjun Singh and clearly exposed him for not having any case to introduce 27% reservations in higher education. But who cares, anyways?
Another important question is why are we talking about reservation for OBCs in particular? As these institutes already have reservations for SC/ST candidates. Also OBCs are a sizeable portion of the society and out of them people who are already graduates and aspiring for further education from such premiere institutes don’t really come across as ‘backward’ people.
So now that we are sure that this quota system does not mean anything to truly ‘backward’ section, lets understand what it means to urban grads who are termed backward on caste basis by the Govt. Actually calling an engineer or doctor as ‘backward’ on caste basis is the biggest way to insult him/her. OBC graduates should be the first ones to protest against such discrimination.
Now for a minute let’s consider that such an urban grad, termed backward by Govt. gets a seat for higher education in IIT or IIM or some other premier institute. How does it help people of his/her caste? What will be his/her social circle?
Does a person who has become say a surgeon on quota basis is going to do anything for his caste?
Obviously he/she cannot. It's not even appropriate to expect that because everybody has a right to chose their own career path.
After passing out from premiere institutes like these and getting a high salaried job this person will settle in some ultra modern urban locality or probably even out of India, have just 1 or 2 kids who will enjoy best of living standard and of course will continue to get quota benefit in India.
So what is the Govt. trying to achieve?
Why this sudden flow of compassion for graduate OBCs from the Govt.?
Well the answer is simple and obvious; secure votes of ignorant and truly backward sections of society by playing caste based politics. Our politicians have inculcated the divide and rule policy very well from the British Raj, if nothing else.
If the Govt. acts in a manner which is just and in true interest of Indian youth, it will gain the youth’s support. But that is not what they want.
Why?
For very obvious reasons, well educated urban youth almost always stay away from their hometowns or even the country itself and rarely vote. Also votes of an educated and well-aware person can never be taken for granted by any party, so why invest in it anyways?
It’s pure vote business, nothing more nothing less.
So what can the youth do to change the country’s fate? Well many things.
To start with, we should all vote. Strike when the iron is hot. This is the right time. The whole nation and especially the Indian youth need to unite and stand by the medicos.
It’s time to follow Gandhiji’s principles. Total non-cooperation with Govt. If all schools, colleges, institutes, hospitals join in a total non-cooperation movement; the Govt. will be forced to kneel down.
We also need more young and educated youth in politics. So long as we have 60 to 80 year old illiterate, ignorant and criminal minded people in Govt. offices, hardly any reforms can be expected.
We should support newly formed parties like the Lok Paritran and come forth to form more such parties.
Revolution is what we need today.
Ending on Spencer’s quote again, as he aptly puts across the government's arrogance as its biggest mistake in the following lines.
‘Anyone who studies the state of things which preceded the French Revolution will see that the tremendous catastrophe came about from so excessive a regulation of men's actions in all their details, and such an enormous drafting away of the products of their actions to maintain the regulating organization, that life was fast becoming impracticable. And if we ask what then made, and now makes, this error possible, we find it to be the political superstition that governmental power is subject to no restraints.’
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)